22 junio, 2009

I simply don't believe

If someone had told me a year ago that today I would be living in a world sunk in an economic crisis worse than the one in 1929, that the greatest newpapers are almost in bankruptcy, that two earthquakes would strike Mexico City, that swine flu would kill thousands, I would have said: I don't belive you. But today this is the reality, the facts. And a zillion other things can be part of that list, like the fact that millions and millons have lost their jobs, houses and families. But there are worst things, for example, lack of values, divorces, water shortages, crazy prophets.
I have to confess that two weeks ago I stopped reading some parts of the newspapers, I was really tired of only reading about wars, money, death and health problems. Today, I tried again and here are the results. It is from BBC, and it is sad, so sad, like a nightmare… Why? I don't have an answer. This should not happend. To read the full text go to bbc.co.uk

The rise of Hate 2.0

By Daniel Emery
Technology reporter, BBC News

Auschwitz 1945
It is thought nearly 3 million people died at Auschwitz

The number of hate and terrorist websites has increased by a third in the past year, according to the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

The Los Angeles-based Jewish human rights organisation put the figure at more than 8,000 in its 2008 report Hate 2.0. It said the presence of such sites "demeans and threatens African Americans, Jews, immigrants, gays and virtually every religious denomination".

And the number of so-called hate sites is growing fast, while the use of social networks to push controversial messages is also on the rise.

In May this year, Facebook became embroiled in a row after a number of Holocaust denial groups were set up on the site.

Critics said Facebook was propagating anti-Semitism, others said that free speech was a cornerstone of society and Facebook should keep its hands off.

At the time, Barry Schnitt, a spokesman for Facebook, said it should be "a place where controversial ideas can be discussed".

"The bottom line is that, of course, we abhor Nazi ideals and find Holocaust denial repulsive and ignorant," he said.

"However, we believe people have a right to discuss these ideas."



A few days later, the site had closed two of the groups, Holocaust is a Holohoax and Based on the facts... there was no Holocaust. It said they had breached the firm's terms of service.

But there are still plenty of other Holocaust denial groups on Facebook: Holocaust is a Myth, 6,000,000 for the TRUTH about the Holocaust, The problem of forged Holocaust photos, and Holocaust Deniers, to name just four.

Denial outlawed

In a visit to the Buchenwald concentration camp in June this year, President Barack Obama criticised Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who had called the Holocaust a "great deception".

"To this day we know there are those who insist the Holocaust never happened, a denial of a fact or truth that is baseless, ignorant and hateful," Mr Obama said in a brief address.

Holocaust denial is illegal in 13 countries, including France, Germany and Israel. It was also a crime in Slovakia, although this law was repealed in May 2005.

The Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden, Italy, and the United Kingdom have all rejected Holocaust denial legislation.

In Europe, citizens are covered by the European Convention on Human Rights which states: "Everyone has the right to freedom of expression."

But it adds that governments can restrict free speech, among other reasons, in the interests of national security, to preserve public safety and for the prevention of disorder or crime.

Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, told the BBC that it was not a freedom of speech issue.

"Holocaust denial is a perfect example of how a hateful idea was incubated on the internet. It promotes hatred, it promotes violence and it's a kind of precursor to genocide.


sites

"It's not the idea that needs to be scrubbed; it's fact that the internet elevates crackpot theories to a level it doesn't deserve.

"These sites aren't about the discussion of ideas; they are about getting people to subscribe to the ideal of hate."

But speaking to the BBC, Douglas Murray, director of think tank The Centre for Social Cohesion, said that society should be able to accept any point of view, even if that view was proven to be false.

"You have to allow different opinions, even lies, as long as they don't incite violence. Otherwise what is true becomes dogma and then becomes incapable of being defended," he said.

07 junio, 2009

05 junio, 2009

today is another louise bourgeois day



As I was driving through Constituyentes, a black SUV passed me by. I stared at it, thinking about everything and anything. A little girl opened one of the SUV's windows and threw a bunch of little pieces of white paper into the wind. Maybe her grades, maybe a drawing or a homework she hated –maybe something she was hiding from her parents. The little girl's hand facing the wind.
But the papers also passed me by... giving me a little hope. That insignicant act. Those silly flying little papers, like in life: a present box filled with nonsense papers to find a nonsense gift, years like paper flying by, hair free, floting in the wind –turning white. Flying papers landing on concrete. But, there was one that continued flying, just like a white butterfly. A little piece of white paper with wings, with a death sentence just behind.

04 junio, 2009

Sí salvemos a los osos polares


Recibí esta imágen hace unos momentos. Me divertió y entristeció al mismo tiempo. Sólo la comparto.

02 junio, 2009

La noticia que hoy me sorprendió

Publicada originalmente en España, les dejó la noticia con la que comencé mi mañana:

Salinger denuncia a la secuela de "El guardián entre el centeno"

'60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye' es el título de la obra denunciada por Salinger

02.06.09 | 15:30 h. INFORMATIVOS TELECINCO / AGENCIAS


El escritor J.D. Salinger presentó este lunes una demanda contra el escritor y la editorial que publicará '60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye'. Salinger alega que el trabajo firmado por J. D. California va en contra de sus derechos de autor.

"La secuela no es una parodia y no hace comentarios sobre el original o lo critica. Es simplemente un plagio", indica la demanda, presentada en el tribunal del distrito de Manhattan. La obra de Salinger ha sido uno de los grandes hitos literarios del siglo XX. Fue publicado en 1951 y, tras cuarenta años sin publicar, su autor ha vuelto a la luz para denunciar a J. D. California y a la editorial por plagio.

El autor que firma la secuela se identifica como J. D. California. La demanda describe a Salinger como "un guardián feroz de su propiedad intelectual" y dice que "no aprobará el uso de su propiedad intelectual por parte de los acusados".

Amazon.com ya publicita en su web el libro y anuncia que la obra será publicada en septiembre por la editorial sueca Nicotext. Esta editorial aún no se ha pronunciado al respecto.

Salinger posee los derechos de autor de su novela desde 1951. El creador de Holden Caufield consiguió con su lenguaje directo provocar a la sociedad americana en los años 50. Ahora, ha salido de su retiro para defender sus derechos de autor a los 90 años tras cuatro décadas sin publicar y casi tres décadas sin aparecer en los medios de comunicación.